Orthopedic portfolio brochure citation list

  1. Radiographic Assessment of Lower Limb Lengthening in Achondroplastic Patients, Using the Ilizarov Frame: A 5-19 Year Follow up Study. Int Journal of Orthopaedics 2014 December 23 1(4): 140-145. Maria A Stefanou, MD, MS, Dimitrios Pasparakis, MD, PhD, Dimitrios Mastrokalos, MD, PhD, Chrisa Tzoumaka-Bakoula, MD, PhD, Nikolaos Papandreou, MD, PhD, Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos, MD, Ph.


    Intra- and interobserver reliability analysis of digital radiographic measurements for pediatric orthopedic parameters using a novel PACS integrated computer software program. J Child Orthop DOI 10.1007/s11832-010-0259-5. Eitan Segev, Yoram Hemo, Shlomo Wientroub, Dror Ovadia, Michael Fishkin, David M. Steinberg, Shlomo Hayek.


    Preoperative planning of total hip replacement using the TraumaCad™ system, Orthopaedic Surgery. December 2010, Volume 130, Issue 12, pp 1429-1432. Ely Liviu Steinberg , Nadav Shasha, Aharon Menahem, Shmuel Dekel.

  2. Meta-Analysis of Navigation vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012, 27, 1177-1182. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK.


    Meta-Analysis of Alignment Outcomes in Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery. J Arthroplasty, 2007; 22(8):1097-1106. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K.


    Computer-Assisted Techniques Versus Conventional Guides for Component Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone J Surg Am. 2011; 93:1377-84 Blakeney W. G. et al.


    Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies. Int Orthop 2010 Apr 8; published online Brin Y.S. et al.

  3. Influence of computer navigation on TKA revision rates. International Orthopaedics (SICOT), 2012 Nov; 36(11):2255-60 Schnurr C, Güdden I, Eysel P, König DP.


    Computer Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasty Reduces Revision Rate for Patients Less Than Sixty-five Years of Age, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 15;97(8):635-42. De Steiger RN, Liu YL, Graves SE.


    Navigierte vs. konventionelle Knieendoprothetik – Ergebnisse nach 10 Jahren Navigation vs. Conventional knee arthroplasty – Results after 10 years Poster shown on DKOU 2014 in Berlin C. Baier et al.


    The Outcome Of Computer Navigation For Primary Knee Arthroplasty. EFORT Congress, London, 2014, May DeSteiger, R. et al.

  4. Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2011 Mar 30 Pang, H.-N. et al.


    Navigated TKA System: Clinical and Radiological Results at a Minimum of 5 Years With Survivorship Analysis. Orthopedics, 2013, 36, e308-e318. Hakki S, Saleh KJ, Potty AG, Bilotta V, Oliveira D. Columbus.


    Clinical outcome using aligament referencing technique in CAS versus conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; Sept 18. Lehnen K. et al.


    Soft tissue balanced navigation of total knee arthroplasties. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Apr;24(2):140-51. Schnurr C, Stolzenberg I, Nessler J, Eysel P, König P.


    Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty:a randomized controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Oct; 18(10):1399-44 Lützner J. et al.


    Does Accurate Anatomical Alignment Result in Better Function and Quality of Life? Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted TKA J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun; 24(4):560-9. Epub 2008 Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D.

  5. Role of Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb; 91 Suppl 1:153-8 Kelley T.C. and Swank M.L.


    Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2009 (SICOT) 33:593-597 Gandhi R. et al.


    Evaluation of Component Positioning in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Imageless Navigation Device Compared with Traditional Methods. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan;24(1):15-21 Najarian B.C. et al.


    Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010, 11:92 Reininga I. et al.


    A New Method of Registration in Navigated Hip Arthroplasty Without the Need to Register the Anterior Pelvic Plane The Journal of Arthroplasty 30 (2015) 55–60 E. T. Davis et al.

  6. Role of Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb; 91 Suppl 1:153-8 Kelley T.C. and Swank M.L.


    Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in THR? Navigation versus conventional freehand Int Orthop 2011 Jan;35(1):19-24. Manzotti A. et al.


    Femoral offset: Anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May;95(3):210-9 Lecerf G. et al.


    Evaluation of a New Leg Length Measurement Algorithm in Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Oct; 463:85-9 Murphy S.B. and Ecker T.M.

  7. Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine (PhilaPa 1976). 2005 Oct 15;30(20):2280-7. Richter et. al.

  8. Does computer assisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses? Spine (PhilaPa1976). 2006 Aug 1;31(17). Gebhard et al.

  9. Patient Perceptions of Computer Assisted Surgery Amit Patel, Maulik Gandhi, Nick Rouholamin, Edward Davis. Dudley Group of Hospitals, UK. International Journal of Surgery 11 (2013) 686e745